Search for: "State v. Olds" Results 961 - 980 of 20,846
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2007, 2:08 am
I'm on the road so this is brief and nearly old news by now, but with that out of the way: This great opinion (PDF) came down from the Tennessee Supreme Court this week in State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 11:32 am
The Supreme Court’s opinion in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 7:06 am by Rick Hasen
An ELB reader notes this provision buried in the rules bill, that would potentially revive some old state calls for a constitutional convention: PROVIDING FOR TRANSPARENCY WITH RESPECT TO MEMORIALS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE… Continue reading The post Will the Republican Rules Package in the House Make Calling a Constitutional Convention More Likely? [read post]
3 May 2022, 4:38 pm by Tom Lynch
At 8:30pm Monday night, Politico reporters Josh Gerstein and Alexander Ward dropped the biggest journalistic bombshell of a year filled with journalistic bombshells when they published a leaked first draft of the Supreme Court’s decision to overrule and strike down the 49-year-old Roe v. [read post]
21 Aug 2006, 8:47 pm
"A two-year-old state law banning sexually suggestive billboards along Missouri highways is unconstitutional, a federal appeals court panel ruled Monday," reports Law.com here. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
In J.W. v, Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc., (CA App,, Dec. 10, 2018), a California state appellate court upheld an award of over $4 million to a girl who, when she was ten years old, was sexually abused by an elder of the Jehovah's Witness church. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 8:23 pm by Kate Howard
The petition of the day is: Esquivel-Quintana v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 1:57 pm by centerforartlaw
By Shlomit Heering* A Case in Review: Neumann v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 9:11 pm
7-1-2009 Washington DC:The United States Supreme Court ruled in Safford Unified School District #1, et al. v. [read post]