Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 961 - 980
of 13,689
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2012, 5:30 am
The case of R. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:11 pm
Watch v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 1:51 pm
.; see Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 2:20 am
This was on the basis that she had not achieved a continuous 12-month period in registered employment. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 11:47 am
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 2:25 am
Sen v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:54 am
Supreme Court in Packingham v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:54 am
Supreme Court in Packingham v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 9:17 am
Supreme Court on June 19, 2017, in Packingham v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 9:17 am
Supreme Court on June 19, 2017, in Packingham v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 8:18 pm
Also rejected George's ex post facto violation (he had moved to Washington State prior to SORNA's passage) on the grounds that failure to register is a continuing offense.Doe v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 5:30 am
The case of R. v. [read post]
23 May 2021, 7:47 pm
In a case decided last month, Bulgarian Orthodox Old Calendar Church v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:53 pm
(Orin Kerr) I recently blogged about United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:52 am
Case date: 11 September 2020 Case number: No. 19-2190-cv Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 12:55 am
BrochinSingle display of trademark on race car and jumpsuit did not establish intent to use the mark for the registered product. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 2:07 pm
Chicago and NRA v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 8:44 am
The Delhi High Court delivered a landmark judgment in the case of Manushi Sangathan v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 3:12 am
The inviolability of documents which are part of a mission archive under arts 24 and 27(2) of the VCDR makes it impermissible to use such documents (or copies) in a domestic court of the host country, absent extraordinary circumstances such as state security, or express waiver from the mission state. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:53 pm
Babenko v Ukraine Appn No 68726/10 of 4/1/12 is an ECHR Chamber decision which looks at the relationship between an applicant’s right to social housing from the state and Art 1 of the ECHR First Protocol.The Applicant was a WWII veteran who registered in 2004 for social housing with the local housing executive. [read post]
