Search for: "State v. S. R. R." Results 961 - 980 of 71,790
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
R (on the application of) Reetha Suppiah and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Interveners [2011] EWHC 2 (Admin) – Read judgment A high court judge has ruled that two asylum seekers and their children were unlawfully detained at Yarl’s Wood immigration centre last year. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 4:22 am
Appeal challenging increasing the school superintendent’s compensation dismissed “for failure to name a necessary party” – the SuperintendentAppeal of George R. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:37 am by Rosalind English
That would elevate the significance of a school’s requisite attention to its paperwork to “an astonishing level”: R (on the application of S (A Child)) v Brent LBC (2002) EWCA Civ 693, (2002) ELR 556). [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:44 am by ASAD KHAN
Mitchell (1823) 2 D & R and Amand [1941] 2 KB 239 fortified this analysis. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am by Mark Spinney, Olswang LLP
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 2:42 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
For judgment, please download: [2014] UKSC 6 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: IA v The Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland) [2014] UKSC 6 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 6:25 am
Grandparents' Visitation Rights - 2011-R-0079You asked for a comparison of Connecticut's law on grandparents' right to visit their grandchildren with the laws on that subject in other states. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:46 am by ASAD KHAN
Lord Carnwath’s interpretation of the Strasbourg jurisprudence did not support a general view that appellant’s oral evidence is a necessary part of an “effective” appeal in the sense contemplated by De Souza Ribeiro (which was interpreted restrictively in IR v UK [2014] ECHR 340). [read post]
27 May 2016, 1:00 am by Liam MacLean, Shepherd and Wedderburn
  It noted that the House of Lords (in R (Clift) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] UKHL 54) had concluded that being treated differently due to one’s status as a prisoner did not come within the ambit of Article 14 discrimination. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:44 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 March 2014. [read post]