Search for: "State v. State Board of Equalization"
Results 961 - 980
of 3,914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2007, 8:06 am
Georgia State Bd. of Equalization) 06-9130 (Ali v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:37 am
United States and Pleau v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 8:00 am
The other case of considerable interest was SEC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 pm
State of Wisconsin Investment Board, 731 A.2d 818, 821 n.1 (Del. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 1:59 pm
The phrase “vote dilution” does not appear in Section 2, but it has been part of the vocabulary of equal voting rights since the Supreme Court decided Thornburg v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 8:00 am
In Stone v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:48 am
The argument in the case of California Franchise Tax Board v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 10:12 am
Arizona would probably have the constitutional authority to enact a flat ban of ethnic studies courses, although that conclusion must be tempered by the plurality opinion in Board of Education v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:13 am
Loving v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 11:17 am
In West Virginia Board of Education v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 9:12 am
Stay tuned as one of our voting rights cases comes before the Supreme Court: Crawford v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:00 am
United States and Weyhrauch v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 2:53 pm
All state laws vary. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 11:03 am
Holding that a state donor insemination statute must be construed to allow the former lesbian partner of a woman who conceived two children during their relationship to seek a legal determination of parental rights, the Oregon Court of Appeals ruled in Shineovich v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 3:04 am
Defendants contend that the parties who drafted the shareholders’ agreement meant for each shareholder to have an equal voice on the board. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Board of Education. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 3:36 am
*Further, the Village Board's policy of treating retired Village mayors and Village Board members differently from active Village mayors and Village Board members did not unconstitutionally deny Kapell the equal protection of the laws, “as it reflects an orderly and rational basis for municipal expenditures. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:11 am
Independent claim 1 of each of the higher ranking auxiliary requests III to V contains fewer features and has a broader scope than that of auxiliary request VI.X. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:11 am
Independent claim 1 of each of the higher ranking auxiliary requests III to V contains fewer features and has a broader scope than that of auxiliary request VI.X. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:25 pm
State Board of Equalization, S200475—Review Granted—May 16, 2012. [read post]
