Search for: "State v. Words"
Results 961 - 980
of 36,203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm
As Eady J said Sunderland Housing Group v Baines ([2006] EWHC 2359 (QB) ) “It seems to me at least right for a defendant who seeks to resist an injunction against publication of defamatory words to identify the defamatory meaning or meanings which he intends to justify and also to state in a witness statement verified by a statement of truth that he believes in the truth of the words in that meaning or those meanings. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:12 am
Nikita Cloyd v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 8:56 pm
Ledbetter v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 4:06 am
Contesting the state’s segregationist policy, they took their case (Parker v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:43 am
In Smiley v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:04 am
In yesterday’s post, I discussed Maryland v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:04 am
In yesterday’s post, I discussed Maryland v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 8:51 am
In December of 2009, the Florida Court of Appeals concluded in Robertson v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 10:26 am
Arizona V. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 10:26 am
Arizona V. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:13 pm
Don't necessarily take nine straight rejections as the final word on the matter. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 1:44 pm
’” Baze v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 9:29 pm
Last week, the court granted review in Ricci v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 12:28 pm
So this whole time, he's been in state facilities at the state's expense. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 7:22 am
We borrow a lot from British English in United States English but that doesn’t usually include the extra consonant in words. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:56 am
In R v May, R v Jennings, R v Green the House of Lords directed courts to consider the three questions which arise in making a confiscation order separately, even if the result was a low order. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 10:23 am
Even in AT & T v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
In other words, if there’s any reason to believe the government’s stated nondiscriminatory purpose, that purpose governs. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 10:23 am
’ Commonwealth v. [read post]
