Search for: "Steven Schwinn" Results 961 - 980 of 986
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2014, 6:30 am by Amy Howe
  Coverage of the decision comes from Tony Mauro of The National Law Journal,  with commentary coming from Matt Bodie at PrawfsBlawg (here and here) and Steven Schwinn at Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Joshua Matz
  Dahlia Lithwick at Slate, Adam Liptak of the New York Times, Nicole Flatow of ACSblog, Mark Sherman of the Associated Press, Allison Hoffman at Tablet (where Daniel Halper previewed the case and Hoffman profiled Nathan Lewin, counsel for the petitioner), Joan Biskupic of USA Today, Warren Richey of the Christian Science Monitor, Steven Schwinn of Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Josh Gerstein of Politico, Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, James Vicini of Reuters, Mike… [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:58 am by Amy Howe
Himmelreich comes from Steven Schwinn for this blog and Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST, while coverage of the decision in Ross v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am by Conor McEvily
’”  At the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Steven D. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 7:30 am by Erin Miller
 To Steven Schwinn at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, the order “seems to suggest Supreme Court review next term, but probably not in time for November’s elections. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary comes from Brian Miller at Forbes, who calls the grant “good news for public employees who have been fighting for years for the right to decide for themselves whether or not to support a union,” Mark Joseph Stern at Slate, Ross Runkel at his eponymous blog, and Steven Schwinn at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, who observes that a ruling against the union in this case will “mark the end of fair share and the likely demise of public sector unions. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:35 am by Matthew Scarola
At the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Steven D. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:48 pm by Erin Miller
Watson, which the Court dismissed as improvidently granted comes from Douglas Berman, again at Sentencing Law and Policy, who highlights some of the issues that the Court did not decide as a result of the DIG; Steven Schwinn at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog briefly discusses some of the complexities of the case. [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:10 am by Nabiha Syed
Greene, which Steven Schwinn also analyzed for Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:40 am by Adam Chandler
  The Washington Post’s Dana Milbank and Constitutional Law Prof Blog’s Steven Schwinn offer close reads of the proceedings as well. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:19 am by Adam Chandler
Steven Schwinn of Constitutional Law Prof Blog and Ilya Somin of the Volokh Conspiracy analyze the dissent’s Commerce Clause implications, and the Atlantic Wire summarizes some of the commentary on the case and what it portends for the challenges to President Obama’s health care reform law. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Joshua Matz
At Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Steven D. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:43 am by Kiera Flynn
At the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Steven Schwinn contrasts yesterday’s decision in PLIVA v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:20 am by Kiran Bhat
Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Jonathan Stempel of Reuters, Josh Gerstein of Politico, Steven D. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
At the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Steven Schwinn remarks that the case made clear that “there’s no fundamental right to public records” in the Constitution, but instead it is a matter for state legislatures. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:15 am by Cormac Early
”  And at Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Steven D. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:39 am by admin
” Constitutional Law Prof Blog’s Steven Schwinn discusses the Cato Institute’s analysis of the DISCLOSE Act, a legislative response to the Court’s holding in Citizens United. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am by Amanda Rice
Briefly: Steven Schwinn of Constitutional Law Prof Blog discusses Tuesday’s argument in The Boeing Company v. [read post]