Search for: "Story v. Peters" Results 961 - 980 of 1,407
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2011, 8:38 pm by Marie Louise
Highlights this week included: Humira (Adalimumab) – US: $1.67B verdict overturned by CAFC, patent invalidated over written description: Centocor v Abbott (Peter Zura’s 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (Patent Law Practice Center) (Patent Docs) (IPBiz) Fexofenadine – Australia: Anti-histamine inventive… but not novel, says Federal Court! [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm by Editor
Recently the Scots Law Student blogged about the human cost of control orders exemplified in a story in the Guardian about two men, best friends, sitting outside one of their homes talking, drinking and eating snacks. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm by Editor
Recently the Scots Law Student blogged about the human cost of control orders exemplified in a story in the Guardian about two men, best friends, sitting outside one of their homes talking, drinking and eating snacks. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:46 am by Russ Bensing
  On Wednesday, I discussed the possibility of the Supreme Court accepting jurisdiction in State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
Highlights this week included: Australian Advisory Council on Intellectual Property releases Final Report on Patentable Subject Matter (Patentology) (ipwars.com) (IP Whiteboard) (IPKat) European Parliament gives go-ahead for enhanced cooperation (EPLAW) (IPKat) (IPKat) (Peter Zura’s 271 Patent Blog) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source… [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:27 am by Stefanie Levine
Michael Davitz, Partner at Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider and  Practice Center Contributor, recently sent in this article he wrote with colleague’s Drew Schulte and Jia Li discussing the Patent Prosecution Highway and the value that can be achieved for those practitioners willing to explore the new program. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am by Marie Louise
Highlights this week included: New White House IP Advisory Committees elevate IP enforcement to highest level (IP Watch) (Patent Baristas) (Copyright Alliance) (The Domains) Leaks show real aim of ACTA, as trade chief declares it binding (IP Watch) (Ars Technica) (KEI) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
There is a story about the case in the Press Gazette, a 5RB case comment and one from 1 Brick Court. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:30 am by INFORRM
There were hearings in the cases of Hunt v Evening Standard (3 February) and Lord Ashcroft v Independent (3-4 February). [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 10:24 pm by Marie Louise
Highlights this week included: Copyright troll gives up in porn-downloading case Mick Haig Productions v Does 1 – 670 (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (TorrentFreak) (ArsTechnica) (Plagiarism Today) US Customs begins pre-Super Bowl online mole-whack (ArsTechnica) (TorrentFreak) (Freedom to Tinker) (TorrentFreak) (Public Knowledge) (ArsTechnica) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed… [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
News Yet again, phone hacking is the leading media law story of the week. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:30 am by INFORRM
For news story, please visit: Intelligence agencies go to supreme court over ruling on secret evidence. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:05 pm by Peter Tillers
Two foci of discussion will be (i) stories, narrative, or rhetoric, and evidential argument; and (ii) burdens of proof. [read post]