Search for: "Sword v. Sword" Results 961 - 980 of 1,039
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2012, 6:30 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Also: an intent to convey a message alone isn’t evidence that the message was conveyed, since intent isn’t required for a violation of the FTCA and it would be “incongruous” to make intent a sword but not a shield (hmm, wish some trademark cases would think of that…). [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 2:01 pm
  A deferred variable annuity is thus a double edged sword: your gains grow tax deferred, but you lose the lower capital gains tax treatment. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:00 am by Bob Ambrogi
In an example provided by LexisNexis, a Georgia case, Durrah v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:11 pm by David Lat
I remember on [a questionnaire] he wrote that he had an interest or a collection of swords. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 6:28 am by Michael Geist
This “Sword of Damocles”, as the intervener the Canadian Association of Research Libraries aptly put it, renders a university’s freedom to clear its copyright obligations without involving Access Copyright completely illusory. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:13 am by Mandelman
The latest decisions from our nation’s courts, including the Massachusetts Supreme Court “Ibanez” decision, Kemp v. [read post]
I thought we might talk a little bit about what is probably the leading case on dress codes, Jespersen v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 9:15 pm
The difference between proprietary estoppel and promissory estoppel is that proprietary estoppel can be used as a sword and shield. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 11:14 am by Robichaud
Secondly, the swords that an advocate chooses to live or die by is theirs and theirs alone. [read post]