Search for: "Taking Offense v. California"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am
Regents of the University of California, 18-587, Trump v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:21 pm
Supreme Court might take this case as an opportunity to clarify the law in this area and resolve the issue of whether the rule applicable in the Ninth Circuit, i.e., in California, is correct. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am
Take solace in the fact that you’ll get to your destination . . . eventually. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 8:32 am
New York: incriminating trustworthy custodial statements made to the police without Miranda Rights warning can be used to impeach a defendant who testifies that he did not commit the offense. 1977 Oregon v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
For example, a few years ago in Arlington v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:59 pm
Sandoval was denied effective assistance of counsel when his attorney urged him to take a plea offer that resulted in his guilty plea to third degree rape and subsequent deportation proceedings. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
The petitioner asks the Court to take the cumulative approach, which the Second and Fourth Circuits have adopted. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 1:24 pm
See Miranda v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 7:05 pm
California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966). [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:19 am
Andrews testified that when she logged on to the IRC network on January 16 and eventually connected to Wright's file-server, . . . she connected through a server in San Jose, California. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 5:59 pm
Justice Kennedy has a somewhat uneven record when it comes to prisoners' rights, having recently written a majority opinion on the side of California prison reform in Brown v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
They take many forms and go by different names, including term sheets, memoranda of understanding, commitment letters, and award letters[1] (this paper will use the term “letter of intent” to refer to all such pre-contract documents). [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:41 am
They’re undoubtedly taking a very close look at the forfeiture statutes here. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
The California law, the Court explained, does exactly that by basically creating a new regulatory scheme for slaughterhouses in California. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 2:56 am
Mapp v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
(likely relisted after June 21 conference) Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
These regional subcommittees make recommen- dations to the full admissions committee, and they take an applicant’s race into account. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
These regional subcommittees make recommen- dations to the full admissions committee, and they take an applicant’s race into account. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:15 am
The court called for the record, indicating at least one of the justices is taking a close look at the case. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:09 pm
California. [read post]
