Search for: "The People v. Chambers" Results 961 - 980 of 1,914
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2015, 8:53 am by Amy Howe
Its decision in Perez v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 2:18 am by INFORRM
The Court found that the instance in question could be viewed as falling within the margin of appreciation accorded to member states: ‘the choice of the means calculated to secure compliance with article 8 of the Convention in the sphere of the relations of individuals between themselves is in principle a matter that falls within the contracting states’ margin of appreciation’, referencing the Grand Chamber in Bărbulescu v Romania ([125]). [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
  We had a comment on the Chamber decision in 2021. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:44 pm by WIMS
That vibrant entrepreneurialism is the key to our continued global leadership and the success of our people. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:46 am by Josh Blackman
Joan explains that as many as 75 people may have had access to the opinion: If tradition was followed, copies were sent electronically and, separately, printed out and hand-delivered to chambers by aides to the marshal. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:54 am by Russ Bensing
”  As the Chambers Brothers told us, time has come today, and in State v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 11:32 am by Giles Peaker
The Upper Tribunal goes on to note that none of this should have happened in view of the guidance given in Avon Ground Rents Ltd v Child (2018) UKUT 204 (LC) (our note). [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 8:46 am
Concluding the court wasn't ready to overturn Gregg v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 6:05 am by Leila Nadya Sadat
This was the position taken by the ICC Appeals Chamber in Al-Bashir, by the Special Court for Sierra Leone in the Taylor case, and by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in the Milosevic case, and is the scenario envisaged by paragraph 61 of the ICJ’s judgment in the Arrest Warrant Case (Congo v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
  There was a piece on the Doughty Street Chambers website about the case. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 9:29 am
In some ways, the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in Alberta v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:46 am by Frank Cranmer
  Jehovah’s Witnesses and blood transfusions The Chamber of the ECtHR to which Pindo Mulla v Spain (application no. 15541/20) had been allocated has relinquished jurisdiction in favour of the Grand Chamber. [read post]