Search for: "US v. Davis"
Results 961 - 980
of 4,721
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2011, 11:15 am
In light of last year’s decision in Worldmark v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 3:27 am
" They say "The State of Georgia v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 4:08 am
Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals Affirms Positive Drug Test Means Incarcerationby Lee DavisState of Tennessee v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:23 am
That brings us back to Davis: As noted above, the trial court judge not only suppressed the statements Davis made at his home, he also suppressed the laptop and a second statement Davis made at the police station. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:07 pm
Federal Rule of Evidence 408 provides: (a) Prohibited uses. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 11:09 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 10:17 pm
Renhcol Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 11:42 am
[Post by Venkat] Lane v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 12:25 pm
To download a copy of the Appellate Term's decision, please use this link: 405 E. 56th St., LLC v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 2:46 am
Case Name: Jenkins v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 2:36 pm
Davis, Judge.Representing Lake: Bernie Q. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 10:17 am
Bernier v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 9:45 am
Near the end of US v. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 12:00 pm
The Seventh Circuit today yet again affirms yet another within-guideline sentence as reasonable in US v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 5:52 am
In ‘94, the Supreme Court decided Davis v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:32 am
Microsoft had filed an ex parte reexamination request on the patent in question, US Patent No. 5,787,449. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
RUEDA, Appellant V. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
PayServices, an Idaho-chartered bank, submitted its master account application in August 2022 with the FRBSF, seeking to use the FRBSF’s transaction-related services to provide payment processing to non-U.S. customers. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 2:58 am
The editors are Paul Cole (Chartered Patent Attorney) and Richard Davis (Barrister). [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 8:12 am
Among those, just eight cite the most relevant texts: the Fourteenth Amendment (the basis for the finding that partisan gerrymandering claims are justiciable under the Constitution in Davis v. [read post]
