Search for: "US v. Holme"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,388
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
The beginnings and development of copyright and the First Amendment are still under-observed: Eldred v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 8:22 am
People v Holmes, 2011 NY Slip Op 8075, 2011 N.Y. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 10:41 am
This is the case of Illinois v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:56 am
It’s wrong of Holmes to do that; it’s not wrong for a democracy to have an aesthetic theory and there’s nothing stopping us from basing copyright/property rights on aesthetic theory. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am
Holmes v Westminster City Council [2011] EWHC 2857 (QB) An interesting appeal from a summary possession order on the issue of consideration of proportionality. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am
Holmes v Westminster City Council [2011] EWHC 2857 (QB) An interesting appeal from a summary possession order on the issue of consideration of proportionality. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
Lord Neuberger’s obiter comments in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-Upon-Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7 on decisions being capable of surviving an error in reasoning were not relevant.iv) In Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2008] EWCA Civ 690, Rimer LJ emphasised that the right to make further representations was not at the discretion of the reviewing officer, based on the officer’s view of whether the representations would be of any value.v) Camden argued that “a flaw in a… [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
Lord Neuberger’s obiter comments in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-Upon-Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7 on decisions being capable of surviving an error in reasoning were not relevant.iv) In Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2008] EWCA Civ 690, Rimer LJ emphasised that the right to make further representations was not at the discretion of the reviewing officer, based on the officer’s view of whether the representations would be of any value.v) Camden argued that “a flaw in a… [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:33 am
[v]6. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 10:23 am
Sport of Kings suits (28%) (big co v. big co) [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
Holmes’, CEO at PatentBridge and Co-Chair of the program, segment where he offered practice tips for patent licensing particularly useful. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
Holmes’, CEO at PatentBridge and Co-Chair of the program, segment where he offered practice tips for patent licensing particularly useful. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Behrend, et al. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:08 am
(I have no one in particular in mind here, but, by way of example, in recent years a number of people seem to have argued both sides of Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 12:34 pm
Do you remember the famous Sherlock Holmes mystery in which the most significant fact, in Holmes's view after explaining how he solved the case, was the dog that did not bark? [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:45 pm
Eisner, 256 U.S. 345, 349 (1921) (Holmes, J.)). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 4:43 pm
Werner v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:05 am
Oppenheimer, 242 U.S. 85, 87-88 (1916) (Holmes, J.). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 7:28 am
These amendments are known as the “Holmes Group fix” because they address issues raised by the Supreme Court’s decision in Holmes Group, Inc. v. [read post]
