Search for: "United States of America v. In the Matter of the Application of the United States"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,383
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2021, 2:13 pm
In 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 6:04 am
This in itself says a great deal about how the law of equality has developed in the United States in the past half century. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 4:03 pm
On 6 December 2019 Warby J heard an application in the case of United Kingdom Independence Party Ltd v Braine & Ors. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:05 pm
Qualifications: Applicants must be United States citizens and enrolled in law school at the time of the internship. [read post]
6 Oct 2024, 12:11 pm
Then, the state’s high court summarily denied Williams’ habeas application. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:52 pm
” United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 10:20 am
However, as the Safe Harbor only permits transfers from the EU to the United States, it is not a global solution. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 11:16 am
In Gray v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
New York,3 that the Supreme Court matter-of-factly held that the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment was “of course” applicable to the states.4 To justify incorporation, Penn Central cited only one 19th century case, which itself did not mention the Fifth Amendment.5 Before Penn Central, the Court relied on the Due Process Clause to restrict the scope of state taking power. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 9:06 am
An amicus curiae brief submitted by the America First Legal Foundation on behalf of neither party in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
(Korean Law Blog) Kosovo Kosovo – new design law (Class 99) Netherlands District Court of The Hague nullifies Dutch part of EP patent finding claims invalid for added matter and lack of inventive step: Vermop Salmon v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
(Korean Law Blog) Kosovo Kosovo – new design law (Class 99) Netherlands District Court of The Hague nullifies Dutch part of EP patent finding claims invalid for added matter and lack of inventive step: Vermop Salmon v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:09 am
Hall Street Associates v. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm
The Court’s caseload means that progress on individual applications can be agonisingly slow; its own Questions & Answers for applicants states that “In view of the current backlog of cases, you may have to wait a year before the Court can proceed with its initial examination of your application” – and that initial examination is only the first step in what can be a long process. [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 2:15 am
In this case, Scandit argued that (unlike the 10x Genomics case) proceedings for the recognition and enforcement in the United States of America of a foreign damages award would result in considerable legal costs which, even if successful, would not have to be reimbursed by the debtor. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
They can make matters worse. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm
McCarthy v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
United States). [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
., Petitioner, v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 4:32 pm
The Human Rights Commission also announces — rather triumphantly, I think — that it does not matter that Encyclopedia Dramatica is hosted and written in the United States, because Australian law, as reflected in Dow Jones v. [read post]
