Search for: "United States v. House of Representatives of United States"
Results 961 - 980
of 4,273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
Only the House of Representatives engaged in any debate on the matter, none of which raised potential policy ramifications. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:49 am
It’s a shame the state that hosted Tennessee v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:02 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> State of Veracruz v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 1:28 pm
The National Journal asked foreign policy experts what the United States should do to combat the Islamic State. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 2:29 pm
For example, in the first Montana House of Representatives hearing on the bill, Defendant Attorney General Knudsen explained: "TikTok is spying on Americans, period. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 2:00 pm
This case (and its close cousin, United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am
It states: “No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the… [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:11 am
It prohibits any “Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under [the United States]” from accepting “any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:38 pm
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive Guide for cerebral palsy. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 2:06 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
Brown v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 6:16 am
According to Article I, Section 7, in order for a “Bill” to “become a Law,” it “shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate” and be “presented to the President of the United States” for signature or veto. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 11:22 am
Much has been said about the wide range of experiences that Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson will bring to her new job on the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
This is just the way the “state unit” system works, whatever the Supreme Court had suggested in Gray v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:54 pm
United States, 234 U.S. 600 (1914). [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
In 2013, in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:38 pm
The House of Representatives voted to repeal the 2002 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), reports the Washington Post. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 12:20 am
House filed an amicus brief arguing that the Convention is not binding on the United States. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 9:25 am
In reaching its decision, the Second Circuit rejected arguments from the House of Representatives, which hired counsel after the DOJ declined to defend the Act. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
If a state were to pass a law today saying that, say, its governor will decide which slate of electors will represent the state in the Electoral College every four years, that law would not violate the United States Constitution.Now, however, such laws have no prospect of being passed in enough states to guarantee a Republican win in 2024. [read post]
