Search for: "United States v. Judge"
Results 961 - 980
of 31,487
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2016, 1:12 pm
Florida, the United States Supreme Court found that Florida’s death-sentencing scheme, which required a judge rather than the jury to make the ultimate factual findings for imposition of a death sentence, unconstitutional holding that “[t]he Sixth Amendment requires a jury, not a judge to find each fact necessary to impose a sentence of death. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 9:18 am
Prior to opening statements in United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 10:14 am
The United States District Court for the Middle District Pennsylvania has affirmed a recommendation from a magistrate judge denying a motion for summary judgment in a legal malpractice suit. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 10:00 pm
The Supreme Court consolidated the three cases and agreed to consider two of the three questions set forth in a July 22, 2020 memorandum of the United States: (1) whether APJs are properly appointed, and (2) if they are not properly appointed, whether removing employment protections corrects the defect. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 10:00 pm
The Supreme Court consolidated the three cases and agreed to consider two of the three questions set forth in a July 22, 2020 memorandum of the United States: (1) whether APJs are properly appointed, and (2) if they are not properly appointed, whether removing employment protections corrects the defect. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 10:00 pm
The Supreme Court consolidated the three cases and agreed to consider two of the three questions set forth in a July 22, 2020 memorandum of the United States: (1) whether APJs are properly appointed, and (2) if they are not properly appointed, whether removing employment protections corrects the defect. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 10:00 pm
The Supreme Court consolidated the three cases and agreed to consider two of the three questions set forth in a July 22, 2020 memorandum of the United States: (1) whether APJs are properly appointed, and (2) if they are not properly appointed, whether removing employment protections corrects the defect. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 10:00 pm
The Supreme Court consolidated the three cases and agreed to consider two of the three questions set forth in a July 22, 2020 memorandum of the United States: (1) whether APJs are properly appointed, and (2) if they are not properly appointed, whether removing employment protections corrects the defect. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 10:00 pm
The Supreme Court consolidated the three cases and agreed to consider two of the three questions set forth in a July 22, 2020 memorandum of the United States: (1) whether APJs are properly appointed, and (2) if they are not properly appointed, whether removing employment protections corrects the defect. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:18 am
Cite this article as: Frank Cranmer, "Social housing and religion again: LF v United Kingdom" in Law & Religion UK, 17 June 2022, https://lawandreligionuk.com/2022/06/17/social-housing-and-religion-again-lf-v-united-kingdom/ [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:29 pm
As SCOTUS explains in Plyler v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 10:30 am
May 13, 2008) (Judge Ryan for a unanimous court), and United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 8:26 pm
The Idaho case is State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 1:33 pm
United States. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:26 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 11:50 am
On the merits, I can find no fault with Judge Graber's opinion.But I'll add one thing. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 6:50 am
Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the Judge “ran afoul” of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges given her participation in media interviews and by making public statements about the “stop and frisk” case. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 11:55 am
When he returned to the United States his abuse of alcohol worsened. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 7:04 am
Judge Daniel rejects the standard boilerplate allegations about joinder: the complaint alleges that, “On information and belief, Defendants are an interrelated group of infringers working in active concert to knowingly and willfully make, use, offer for sale, sell, and/or import into the United States for subsequent sale or use the same product that infringe the **552 Patent in in a series of occurrences. [read post]
