Search for: "United States v. Lawrence" Results 961 - 980 of 1,590
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am by Amy Howe
United States and argues that “the lopsided win illustrates the need for a federal statute defining the default mens rea (guilty mind) to be proven in criminal cases. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a guilty plea waives a challenge to the constitutionality of an offense. [read post]
Eight months before the 2016 presidential election, the President of the United States nominated a respected jurist to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:22 am by Howard M. Wasserman
Arguments of the United States Assistant to the Solicitor General Benjamin Snyder argued for the United States in support of neither party. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Today, same-sex unions represent a tiny share of marriages in the United States. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” At National Review, Carrie Severino calls Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:01 pm
The following is a list of facilities for individuals with cerebral palsy in Mississippi compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive One-Stop Resource Guide to help locate assistance. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:18 pm by Ryan Calo
But were a court to hold that Google’s algorithms “know” my emails the way a human employee would—and, accordingly, that I no longer have a reasonable expectation of privacy under United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 6:29 am by Nabiha Syed
Lawrence Hurley of Greenwire (via the New York Times) discusses the Court’s denial in General Electric Co. v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 12:30 pm by Mark Graber
 One might think that the very conservative Supreme Court’s refusal to overrule Roe and recognize a right to homosexual sodomy in Lawrence v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 1:21 pm by Eric Turkewitz
This is the heart and soul of the decision: That premise is inconsistent with the reasoning underlying the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Lawrence v Texas (539 US 558 [2003]), in which the Court held that laws criminalizing homosexual conduct violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution (id. at 578). [read post]