Search for: "United States v. Paul" Results 961 - 980 of 4,466
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2019, 12:41 pm by Lev Sugarman
To organize those rallies, IRA employees posed as U.S. grassroots entities and persons and made contact with Trump supporters and Trump Campaign officials in the United States. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:01 pm by Andrew Siegel
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Parker Drilling Management Service, Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 11:30 pm by Dáire McCormack-George
I include those who are unemployed because, in most cases, unemployed people are now commonly assumed to be (paid) ‘job-seekers’ and may have certain social welfare entitlements which provide them with the most basic means for survival.[2] These distinctions may seem sharp and clear-cut as stated here. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003) (upholding criminal punishment for true threats); United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003) (upholding criminal punishment for true threats); United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The plaintiff [Petitioner] in this action was initially employed by the City of Lockport [Lockport] in a position in a collective bargaining unit represented by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees [AFSCME]. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The plaintiff [Petitioner] in this action was initially employed by the City of Lockport [Lockport] in a position in a collective bargaining unit represented by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees [AFSCME]. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 6:45 am by John Floyd
  In May 2017, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 2:24 pm by Richard Hunt
App’x 933, 941 (11th Cir. 2009) (holding that because the Guidelines are not mandatory, the fact that a covered complex does not comply with the Guidelines does not establish a violation of the FHAA); United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 2:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
Section 11 claims, will cost more to defend and settle: In 2018, the United States decided Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm by INFORRM
United States A federal judge in Virginia has ruled that a defamation claim against Inforwars host Alex Jones can proceed against him and other defendants over the Charlottesville rallies that led to the death of protester Heather Heyer. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm by Neil Siegel
Sanders, the Court invalidated Georgia’s primary election law and county unit system. [read post]