Search for: "United States v. Smith" Results 961 - 980 of 5,033
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am by Jason Rantanen
” From the Introduction:  On August 11, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down its opinion in one of the most closely-watched, and potentially consequential, antitrust decisions in recent years, Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 10:14 am by Unknown
McKee (Tribal Courts; Water Rights) United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 7:42 am by Eugene Volokh
He was a member of the United States Army, serving from 1997 to 2003—including a seven- month tour of duty in Afghanistan following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 2:05 pm by SCOTUStalk
And I was representing the United States as an amicus to Ohio, and I had not actually written the briefs in this case. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
The case “could have big implications for parties that have an interest in the development or protection of the seafloors surrounding the United States — environmentalists and industry actors alike,” Smith writes. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:03 am
United States is a 1977 Supreme Court case that addressed the proper standard for pornography convictions. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:03 am by bhorton
United States is a 1977 Supreme Court case that addressed the proper standard for pornography convictions. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 12:00 pm by Amy Howe
The cases scheduled for argument during the November session are below: United States Fish & Wildlife Service v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 9:57 pm by Florian Mueller
Chen of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California apparently got the same impression, which is why he set a TRO hearing (to be conducted via Zoom) for Monday, August 24:"CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING HEARING AND BRIEFING FOR [17] MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER: Hearing re: [17] MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Why Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue and Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support… [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 11:58 am by SCOTUStalk
This is Tom Goldstein and Justice David Souter in Georgia v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 2:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court of the United States has interpreted the Sixth Amendment and the First Amendment as imposing a presumption that criminal trials, including voir dire, will be open to the public. [read post]