Search for: "United States v. Stevens"
Results 961 - 980
of 4,055
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2009, 9:55 am
For more information please refer to the United States Supreme Court Opinion: Wyeth v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 1:49 pm
” — Kristina Littman, as newly appointed SEC Cyber Chief in her 2020 breakout enforcement action, SEC v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:40 am
They contend that Congress gave the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) and National Governing Bodies (NGB)—like USA Cycling—exclusive jurisdiction over eligibility for competitions. [read post]
20 May 2008, 7:28 am
Along with last term's decision in United Haulers Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 2:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 7:40 am
United States v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 7:09 am
United States; Shell Oil Company v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 8:29 am
Facts: This case (Rogers, Steven et al v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:34 am
Here's the opinion in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:59 am
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:34 pm
Ginsburg’s position here recalls her (also unexplained) flip between the Scalia and Breyer camps in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 9:07 am
June 28, 2024), the United States Supreme Court (Roberts, J.) held that the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) requires courts to independently determine whether an agency has acted within its authority. [read post]
19 May 2008, 2:20 pm
" Justices Stevens, joined by Justice Breyer, filed a concurrence, explaining his view that in addition to the other limiting constructions in the majority opinion, the statute should be read to "contain an element of lasciviousness" - i.e., with the purposes of "inciting sexual arousal. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 4:42 am
California and United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 1:43 pm
Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Trademark Office (PDF) Reply Brief for Petitioner Bernard L. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:05 pm
Oral arguments began in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 9:10 pm
On May 19, 2008, the United States Supreme Court affirmed a conviction involving the mere promoting of child pornography, as opposed to the possession or distribution of such material, even if no child pornography is behind the promotion. [read post]
5 May 2009, 9:00 pm
FCC v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 11:07 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled in Berkemer v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:06 am
The rulings are: In United States v. [read post]
