Search for: "United States v. Wells" Results 961 - 980 of 28,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2008, 4:59 pm
  The United States Supreme Court seems to otherwise have tried to put the calamity of Bush v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:10 pm by Victoria VanBuren
Strong, Professor of Law at the University of Missouri and contributor to this blog, wrote recently an excellent article entitled “Jurisdictional Discovery in United States Federal Courts. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 2:15 pm by Native American Rights Fund
United States Department of the Interior (Trademarks - Official Tribal Names) Coriz v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 11:56 am
Like this opinion by Judge VanDyke this morning:"Petitioner has been a lawful permanent resident (LPR) of the United States since 2003. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:03 am by Marissa Miller
Today’s clippings include further commentary on the Court’s decision in the GPS tracking case, United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 2:30 pm by Chip Merlin
Some of the best policyholder lawyers in the United States have volunteered considerable time to support United Policyholders Covid Loss Recovery Initiative. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 10:50 am
Judge Milan Smith has a fairly good quote in this regard that's both accurate and worth repeating: "Even at a time when the largest law firms in the United States were composed of not many more than one hundred lawyers, Judge Friendly observed that we live in an 'age of increased specialization and high mobility of the bar.' Spanos v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 3:23 am
The Board observed that the "well known mark" doctrine does not provide a basis for a Section 2(d) claim, nor does the United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 6:33 pm by Rick Hills
United States, as an illustration of one fundamental truth: Partisan politics trumps institutional loyalty. [read post]
30 Apr 2025, 9:30 pm by ernst
Wilkins, the Court denied John Elk the right to vote on the grounds that he was born a tribal member, not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, and thus ineligible for citizenship. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 10:30 am by Todd Janzen
Today the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Sackett v. [read post]