Search for: "Urbanic v. Urbanic"
Results 961 - 980
of 2,637
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2009, 9:54 am
Urban trail riding is different from the road. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 9:09 pm
Petrone v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:47 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 3:42 am
Also, by not holding a hearing the City Council lost the benefit of judicial deference.EMMRandall comments: This is a two-way street as the Appellate Division indicated in Murane v Department of Educ. of the City of New York. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 10:07 pm
It will also create a bit more confusion across political lines by further showing how an "activist court" can both produce Roe v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 6:41 am
The case is Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 6:36 pm
Trop, Inc. v City of Brookhaven, 2014 WL 4958232 (GA 10/6/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ga-supreme-court/1680049.html Filed under: Adult Entertainment Facilities, Current Caselaw [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:05 pm
And now comes the urban legend part. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 11:35 am
This issue, which has come to be known by the shorthand expression “reverse CEQA,” is now under consideration by the California Supreme Court in California Building and Industry Association v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 3:51 pm
Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am
§ 15303), and the Class 32 exemption for “in-fill development” projects within city limits on sites not greater than “five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses[.] [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 2:48 am
Westbrook Dolphin Square Ltd v Friends Provident Life and Pensions Ltd [2011] EWHC 2302 (Ch)This is probably one of the most factually complicated collective enfranchisement cases imaginable. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 2:48 am
Westbrook Dolphin Square Ltd v Friends Provident Life and Pensions Ltd [2011] EWHC 2302 (Ch)This is probably one of the most factually complicated collective enfranchisement cases imaginable. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:41 am
As study after study has showed, residence, especially in urban centers, can be the most accurate predictor of race” (United States v Bishop, 959 F2d 820, 827-828 [9th Cir 1992]).Subsequently, however, in Boyde v Brown, (404 F3d 1159, 1171 [9th Cir 2005]) either sharply limited or overruled this holding:It may be unpersuasive for a prosecutor to use residence without attempting to tie it to the facts of the case. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 11:52 am
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:27 am
Such was the case in Kerson v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 9:39 am
While these national proceedings were pending, the opposition division of the EPO revoked EP’214 based on Urban’s added matter argument. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 1:54 am
In Bush v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:51 am
Highland v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
A principal of zoning since the United State Supreme Court upheld an early zoning ordinance in 1926 (Village of Euclid v. [read post]
