Search for: "Utah v. United States"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2014, 10:47 am
This was the first federal appeals court decision to interpret the scope of the Supreme Court’s decision a year ago in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm
Georgia Shelby Bell, University of Minnesota: The Presidency as a Tool for Foreign Policy: An Exploration of the Implications of United States v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm
Georgia Shelby Bell, University of Minnesota: The Presidency as a Tool for Foreign Policy: An Exploration of the Implications of United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 7:25 am
United States, in which the Court held that land exchanged with or transferred to the owners of private property under an 1875 law once again became their property when the railroad that ran across the property has been abandoned. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:08 am
In Cline – answering questions of state law certified to it by the United States Supreme Court – the Oklahoma Supreme Court had nothing but good things to say about off-label use.Cline was somewhat different than Abbottin its facts. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
State, 686 S.E.2d 483, 485-86 (Ga. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 8:17 am
U.S.: New and Amended Actions Microsoft has filed or amended four civil suits in the United States: • Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
"] From Miller v. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 3:15 pm
Tapp, 490 P.2d 334 (Utah 1971); State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 6:00 am
United States is met, or whether, as the U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
United States (relisted after the 9/26 Conference) Docket: 10-9333 Issue(s): Whether the U.S. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 11:40 am
According to Judge Lourie: Myriad Genetics, Inc. and the Directors of the Univer- sity of Utah Research Foundation (collectively, “Myriad”) appeal from the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York holding that an assortment of medical organizations, researchers, genetic counselors, and patients (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) have standing under the Declaratory Judgment Act to challenge Myriad’s… [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
United States, 10-9746 (ditto); and Wesevich v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 1:44 pm
“This origins of this contentious case lie in a soured business relationship and the settlement of earlier litigation in the United States District Court for the District of Utah. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:56 am
In her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse weighs in on the four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 12:46 pm
Seltzer v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
Stephens, 13-6646, a one-time relist in which a pro se petitioner (in gaol for having a bit too much o’ the green) argued that he was denied counsel at a “critical stage” of his criminal proceedings in violation of United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 8:56 am
Natural Resources Defense v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:27 am
Second, I am a little confused by the statement that "Panel determined that a disciplinary proceeding is not the proper forum for a declaration that a rule [Rule 83-1.5 of the Civil Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Utah] is unconstitutional. [read post]
