Search for: "Wal-Mart Inc. Stores" Results 961 - 980 of 1,969
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2012, 7:37 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Co-authored by Richard Alfred and Kevin Young As readers of our blog know from prior posts, we have argued successfully before several courts that the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 3:15 pm
  Well, RBS has refused to throw in the towel and is now putting up its “Dukes,” citing the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 11:00 am by Brien Roche
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 766 N.E.2d 1118 (Ill. 2002), the Court took a somewhat different position noting that, in this instance, Wal-Mart was aware not only of Happel’s drug allergies but also that the particular medication was contraindicated for persons such as Happel that had an allergy to medicine. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 5:46 am
Wal Mart Stores, Inc., the Third Circuit laid down important rules for FLSA collective action certification. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 3:09 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 Although it's always a perilous enterprise to predict where SCOTUS is going, I have some difficulty picturing the Supreme Court that decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 5:30 am
Wal Mart Stores, Inc., and it's the Case of the Week. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 6:21 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Maatman, Jr. and Jennifer Riley In recent posts, we have recounted efforts by the plaintiffs’ class action bar to “re-boot” class certification theories to work around the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:26 pm by Greg Mersol
One year later, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 11:16 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Co-authored by Richard Alfred and Kevin Young It has been more than a year since the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 11:45 am by David Melancon
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., that indicated that a party does not have a duty to eliminate all variations in elevations along streets, sidewalks and parking lots. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 3:03 am by John L. Welch
Etablissements Quinson, Opposition No. 91179408 [Section 2(d) opposition to CHEMIN DES PAPES for "wines, sparkling wines, distilled spirits and liquors," in view of the registered mark CHATEAUNEUF-DU-PAPE CONTROLE & Design for "wine that originates from chateauneuf-du-Pape"].August 9, 2012 - 2 PM: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 2:27 am by Andrew Trask
" The decline in Ninth Circuit filings is probably due to a combination of the fallout from Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:31 am by Soroush Seifi
One interpretation of the Wal-Mart decision may allow for the recognition of the parties’ right to have such discussions regarding most employment-related matters. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 6:15 pm
  The law firm has brought Salmonella lawsuits against such companies as Cargill, ConAgra, Peanut Corporation of America, Sheetz, Taco Bell, Subway and Wal-Mart. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 6:15 pm
The law firm has brought Salmonella lawsuits against such companies as Cargill, ConAgra, Peanut Corporation of America, Sheetz, Taco Bell, Subway and Wal-Mart.  [read post]