Search for: "Walker v. State" Results 961 - 980 of 2,571
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  I have argued that Judge Walker’s judgment probably should be vacated (and language near the end of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Karcher v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:22 am
In its opinion, the court cited United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 8:32 am
HHJ Halbert has given judgment in a case called Southern Pacific Personal Loans Ltd v Walker (12 March 2009, Chester County Court) and has determined that Southern Pacific (”SP”) cannot enforce a particular loan against Mr & Mrs Walker. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 7:32 pm by Mark Graber
  The rare student who turns in an unacceptable pass-fail assignment cannot complain merely because the professor found the other 350 distinctive papers acceptable.Justice Samuel Alito’s celebrated dissent in the Texas license plate case, Walker v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 5:59 am by Amy Howe
At Cato at Liberty, Ilya Shapiro discusses the amicus brief that Cato – along with “a team of expert offenders of good taste who are equally expert defenders of free speech” – filed in Walker v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 2:25 am by Amy Howe
  NPR’s Nina Totenberg covered the decision (along with the Court’s decision in Walker v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:40 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals holds that this law violates the First Amendment.The case is Safelite Group v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 12:42 pm by Bill
The real concern here is whether this case will end up re-writing the actual malice rule of New York Times v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 6:27 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court throws in some language about how qualified immunity is often inappropriate at the motion to dismiss stage.The case is Sabir v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:26 am by Amy Howe
District Judge Vaughn Walker striking down California’s ban on same-sex marriage, noting that although the Supreme Court later “chose to speak on gay marriage through a narrower case, ruling only that the federal government must recognize marriages solemnized under state law,” since then the lower courts “have been reading the [United States v.] [read post]