Search for: "Wall v. State of California"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,293
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2018, 5:46 pm
On May 21, 2018, in the case of Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 9:07 pm
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) waived 26 administrative and environmental protection laws to expedite construction of a wall along portions of the United States’ border with Mexico. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:19 am
Finally, Wendy Kaminer has a piece for the Atlantic on the federal sex offender case, United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 6:17 am
The second O’Connor story comes from the state of Nevada, where voters are considering a ballot initiative that would change the way the state judges are selected. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 11:26 am
Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 347-48 (2011), the Supreme Court held that the FAA preempted California state law, which deemed such class-action waivers unconscionable in consumer cases. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:47 am
California, supra; United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 11:26 am
Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 347-48 (2011), the Supreme Court held that the FAA preempted California state law, which deemed such class-action waivers unconscionable in consumer cases. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 10:29 am
"I know they are permissible under the Supreme Court’s 1990 ruling in the Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:52 am
Apple v Samsung v Apple v Samsung v Apple....Last year the AmeriKat was constantly up-to-date reporting on the latest of the patent mobile phone wars. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 11:58 am
” Citing to and quoting from its decision in California Oak Foundation v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am
” At Medium, Nick Lum points out that the South Dakota attorney general, who represented the state in South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 12:55 pm
In a ruling that is being hailed as a victory for web scrapers and the open nature of publicly available website data, the Ninth Circuit today issued its long-awaited opinion in hiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 12:00 pm
The only judge in the world who has held so far that Apple deserved a patent on that concept is Judge Lucy Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 2:41 am
Stated otherwise, what is the relationship between trademark awareness and brand strength? [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
(See Hurley v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:36 am
”[1] In general, “ERISA preempts state law regarding forfeiture of retirement benefits. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
Buie, No. 070258 Sentence of fifteen years for being a felon in possession of a firearm is affirmed where: 1) because the maximum penalty for the offense to which defendant pleaded guilty was ten years or more under state statute, defendant's state felony narcotics conviction qualified as a "serious drug offense" under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA); and 2) defendant's allegation that he was deprived of counsel at his plea hearing did not state a… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
: Trek Bicycle Corporation v Trek Winery, LLC (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer's Mind) District Court C D California: No preliminary injunction in ‘Planet [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
: Trek Bicycle Corporation v Trek Winery, LLC (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer's Mind) District Court C D California: No preliminary injunction in ‘Planet [read post]
