Search for: "Wells v. Department of Health and Human Services" Results 961 - 980 of 1,300
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2023, 2:23 pm by Maribeth Meluch
” The DOL estimates that small entities will see the biggest impact with 1.3 million employees affected, mostly in the professional and technical services, health care services, and retail trade. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 9:25 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The art and the benefit of the exit interview is lost on so many companies today–too often because departing employees are dismissed as resentful and unreliable. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
As an article in The Hillnotes, its plan for the Department of Health and Human Services “calls for revoking Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the abortion pill mifepristone, which is used in more than half of abortions nationwide. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 10:01 pm by Coral Beach
This year the Town Hall panel is scheduled to include: Al V. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:08 am by Guest Author
Building on my collaborative behavioral policy research, including with On Amir and Yuval Feldman, I argue that—just the field behavioral science first developed in marketing departments, catering to corporate profit, interested in consumer behavior, and only later came to be recognized as significant in policy-making focused on well-being and welfare—so should policy-makers now turn their attention to understanding the… [read post]
16 May 2016, 8:46 am by Lyle Denniston
There are existing regulations, issued in several versions by the Department of Health & Human Services, on ways to implement the birth-control mandate. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am by Marty Lederman
  That court, by a vote of 6 to 3, denied the government’s motion to stay a preliminary injunction that Judge Tanya Chutkan issued against officials of the Department of Health and Human Services, prohibiting them from interfering with the efforts of Doe’s guardian and attorney ad litem to transport her to a clinic to obtain an abortion. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:45 am by William Ford
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Back when I was a summer associate at White & Case, we used to talk about SEC v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Casey – as well as from a case in which these rights were applied to minors—Bellotti v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 9:25 am by admin
” The latter is a lovely sentiment, but human beings can be in countries unlawfully, just as they can be in the Capitol Building illegally. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-5163 September 13, 2011 Judge: Griffith Areas of Law: Government & Administrative Law, Health Law, Public Benefits In a 2008 administrative appeal, the Secretary of Health and Human Services ruled that a Medicare beneficiary enrolled in Medicare Part C still qualified as a person "entitled to benefits" under Medicare Part A. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a proposed rule that would implement a section of the Affordable Care Act that prohibits discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:26 pm by Steve Delchin
  The new mandate by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) requires employers to cover contraceptives and abortion-causing drugs in their employee health care plans. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:26 pm by Steve Delchin
  The new mandate by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) requires employers to cover contraceptives and abortion-causing drugs in their employee health care plans. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:33 pm by Elaine Hou
Empire Health Foundation (2022), the Ninth Circuit vacated the Department of Health and Human Service’s (“HHS’s”) rule, determining that the statute unambiguously precluded HHS’s interpretation. [read post]