Search for: "Wells v. Sullivan" Results 961 - 980 of 1,382
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2012, 8:30 am
In a decision that will have ripple effects in many trade secret and IP disputes, the federal magistrate in the Apple v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:00 pm by Florian Mueller
He expressed great admiration for Apple's contribution to innovation in a 2013 ruling in an Apple v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
The operator of E-Station, a supplier of EV charging equipment, is seeking $350,000 in general damages as well as aggravated and special damages, his claim filed in the federal court states. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 8:19 am by Eric
Microsoft has made such benevolent dictatorship decisions before as well. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 11:31 pm by Orin S. Kerr
Here as well, Deputy Creager solely relied on state law grounds for his conduct, and never suggested that he was investigating federal law. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am by Jack Goldsmith
But even if one views this situation as non-extraterritorial, which is not obvious, there is no assurance that Norton will sue Fox in New York: Norton may well be able to get personal jurisdiction over Fox in many fora. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:00 am by Jesse Lempel
But the Supreme Court, in its 1977 decision in Zacchini v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:39 am by Steve Hall
On Friday, the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled in Hobbs v. [read post]