Search for: "Chief Justice of the United States" Results 9781 - 9800 of 14,935
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2013, 10:42 am by Benjamin Wittes
  NSA’s signals intelligence activities are largely conducted under Executive Order 12333 (“United States Intelligence Activities”) and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (“FISA”)—both of which have been amended over the years. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  The statute set up certain procedures and certain tribunals through which the federal government has to go in order to be allowed to monitor and intercept electronic communications involving persons outside the United States. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:20 am by Benjamin Wittes
  The government need only demonstrate that the surveillance targets “persons reasonably believed to be located outside the United States” and seeks “foreign intelligence information. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 6:17 pm by Alan Rozenshtein
Justice Alito wrote the opinion of the court, and was joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 11:32 am
The United States Supreme Court has been especially busy these last two last weeks, so much forewarned, perhaps, that when Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. made a rare appearance in the U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 6:55 am by Anna Kloeden
The emphasis Justice Sachs, as author of the judgment, placed on drafting this (probably foregone) legal conclusion in a way which, as far as possible, united rather than divided, or at least took account of and respected the ‘conscience and dignity’ of persons on all sides of the debate, relates in no small part to the transformative role the South African Constitutional Court sees itself playing in the post-apartheid context. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 12:46 pm by Larry
CIT judges, as federal judges under Article III of the Constitution may, with the consent of the Chief Justice, sit in other federal courts. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 5:12 am by Jack Goldsmith
  However, as I stated previously, ‘this administration has not carried out drone strikes inside the United States and has no intention of doing so. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 5:34 am
Chief Justice Roberts delivered the opinion of a unanimous Supreme Court of the United States this week in the case of Chafin v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 10:51 am by Charles Kotuby
U.S. courts can “command[] [a party properly before it] to take action … outside the United States” under the pain of sanctions for non-compliance, the Chief Justice said. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 11:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
In 2005, I wrote a further item on my dream list: to be the president of United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 11:54 am by Gene Quinn
Dissecting Bilski: The Meaning of the Supreme Patent DecisionWho knows what goes through the minds of anyone, let alone a cloistered Justice of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:21 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The Court, consisting of Chief Justice Herb Yazzie, Associate Justice Eleanor Shirley, and Associate Justice by Designation William Platero, will hear oral argument in the case: Neptune Leasing, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 11:00 pm by Dennis Crouch
And it now is grown by more than 90 percent of the 275,000 soybean farms in the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 1:25 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Compromise is the key to maintaining any union worth having, and Lincoln believed firmly that the United States – this great experiment – should not perish from the earth. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 1:25 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Compromise is the key to maintaining any union worth having, and Lincoln believed firmly that the United States – this great experiment – should not perish from the earth. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm by Orin Kerr
The state (and the United States as an amicus in support of Maryland) advocates a balancing approach. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:40 am by TJ McIntyre
  Section 5 is a computer-specific offence and deals with persons who, without lawful excuse, operate a computer within the State with intent to access any data kept either within or outside the State, or outside the State with intent to access any data kept within the State, whether or not any data is actually accessed. [read post]