Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT"
Results 9781 - 9800
of 112,789
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 5:41 pm
Taylor held that attempted Hobbs Act robbery does not qualify as a “crime of violence” for purposes of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:23 pm
It finds that the Israeli equivalent to Defend Forward is far less regulated than its U.S. parallel, and that the Israeli version of Persistent Engagement at home allows domestic action and harnesses the private sector in ways that the U.S. approach does not contemplate. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 7:21 am
. __ (June 23, 2021), the Supreme Court holds that pursuit of a fleeing misdemeanor suspect does not categorically qualify as an exigent circumstance that permits police to enter a home without a warrant. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:56 pm
., January 5, 2016) (affirming summary judgment in favor of defendant on plaintiff's age- and race-discrimination claims)WagesNesbitt v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:12 am
[The Intercept] * For a guy with a Real Housewives pedigree, Tom Girardi does not understand a hot mic. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 7:16 am
But the Federal Circuit has admonished that just because the claims involve an abstract idea does not mean that they are directed to an abstract idea. . . . [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 9:31 am
The prosecutor assigned to your felony case probably does not want to go to trial any more than you do. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 4:05 am
However, the court held that the couple does have individual standing to pursue their Establishment Clause, Equal Protection and Due Process challenges to the grants. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 1:48 pm
Reasonable foreseeability with respect to the future depreciation of an asset does not come into play. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:41 am
The Circuit does, however, vacate the (consecutive) sentence because of the inadequacy of the Judge’s explanation. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 5:30 am
Yet, commentators note that the language of a Concurring Opinion by Justice Alito may spur Defendants to continue to attack the statute.Under a recent Order, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court punted and remanded the issue all the way back down to the trial court for consideration, thereby rejecting the Defendants' attempt at a fast-tracked review by the Commonwealth's highest Court on continuing challenges to the question of whether or not Pennsylvania's consent… [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 7:38 am
Thus, his analysis results in a damages calculation that overcompensates Plaintiffs and does not appropriately reflect the inventions' footprints in the marketplace. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 8:14 am
In Doe v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:55 am
The Federal Circuit, on appeal, entered 'judgment of no infringement as a matter of law' because by 'failing to respond to [Defendant’s] argument in the briefing, [plaintiff] effectively conceded that the accused devices' run applications in a manner that does not meet the 'virtual machine' element of the claims. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 6:29 am
. ___ (2014), ruling by a 7-2 vote that the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 ("SLUSA") does not bar state-law securities class actions in which the plaintiffs allege that they purchased uncovered securities that the defendants misrepresented were backed by covered securities. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 12:00 am
The Supreme Court Justices found in more than one case that a crime that does not result in death may not be punished by death. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
And I do not see how Defendants will “suffer immense prejudice,” ... if they have to defend themselves on the merits. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 7:10 am
The court denied in part defendants' motion for database costs. [read post]
17 May 2012, 8:03 am
., et al. and can be found here.In Townsend, the Plaintiff was the director of human resources for the defendant corporation. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
The Court will therefore deny Plaintiffs’ motion on this ground because they have not conclusively shown that Defendants’ denial caused them substantial hardship....Plaintiffs are not entitled to judgment on the pleadings on their equal terms claim because the Complaint does not identify a “nonreligious assembly or institution” that received comparatively better treatment under the zoning laws at issue here.... [read post]
