Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 9781 - 9800 of 21,692
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Supreme Court finally ruled that many restrictions on lawyer advertising violated free speech, in Bates v. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 2:37 pm
In Case C-228/03 Gillette Co v LA-Laboratories Ltd Oy, the CJEU stated that use that does not create an impression of commercial connection or take unfair advantage of the earlier mark’s distinctive character or repute will be considered honest practice. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 8:41 am by Bill Otis
McHugh and (for example) Mark Obbie of Slate spoke with me before writing about my views. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” [This became painfully evident in the 1896 Supreme Court case Plessy v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:39 am by Amy Howe
” At the Fed Soc Blog, Richard Pildes previews Puerto Rico v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 7:45 am by Wendy
To mark 150 years of the ICLR (which publishes the Official and Weekly Law Reports, among others) Lord Neuberger delivered a speech earlier this week highlighting the most important 15 cases from those 150 years. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 12:01 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
This marks the “first time an affiliate of the extremist group has directly hit the international force in Yemen. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 10:07 am by Mark Rumold
The declaration and diagram were based on information provided to us by whistleblower Mark Klein. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Supreme Court opinion in Chae Chan Ping v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:10 am
This case seems to begetting out of hand ...To recap, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) gave its ruling on Wednesday 16 September in the '3D chocolate finger' trade mark case,  Case C-215/14 Nestlé v Cadbury [noted by Eleonora here]. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:13 pm by Florian Mueller
Alsup of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued a third case management order in the remand proceedings of the Oracle v. [read post]