Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 9781 - 9800
of 16,997
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2016, 5:13 am
Unlike in the UK, there is no formal mechanism for ensuring consistency between how individual Tribunal members perceive the circumstances of LGBTQ people in India (although some consistency is created by frequent reference to the same sources of country information). [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 10:41 am
I’m pleased to report that yesterday, a New Jersey appellate court affirmed a grant of summary judgment to the defendant in an interesting online libel case, Roberts v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:13 am
Unlike in the UK, there is no formal mechanism for ensuring consistency between how individual Tribunal members perceive the circumstances of LGBTQ people in India (although some consistency is created by frequent reference to the same sources of country information). [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 7:25 am
Right to Life, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:02 am
v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 10:58 pm
See Hawkins v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 5:38 pm
Granting a censorship power that broad will lead to speech being taken down for political reasons, and a mechanism must be in place to prevent that. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 2:01 pm
People often do the same thing with the term "common law. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
If granted, this case, which involves a Second Amendment challenge to a city ordinance banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, will match Comcast v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 8:39 am
D.P. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 8:39 am
D.P. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
Tort tries to get people to make safer products to encourage innovation, but also leads to anxieties about creating new stuff b/c it risks litigation v. doing what everyone else is already doing. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:47 am
True, in People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 10:12 pm
The Supreme Court granted an injunction in South Bay II. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 7:58 am
In Davila v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 3:00 pm
” In West Virginia v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:50 am
” Granting summary for the employer, the federal court in Minnesota explained that even assuming the profanity was sufficiently severe to be considered harassment, the employee failed to show that it was based on race (Senter v Stericycle, Inc). [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 3:44 pm
In addition to the confidentiality of the information sought, a subpoena duces tecum may not be used for purposes of procuring discovery, or to ascertain the existence of evidence (see Matter of Amex v Vinci, 63 AD3d 1055 [2d Dept. 2009]; Matter of Terry D., 81 NY2d 1042, 1044 [1993], citing People v Gissendanner, 48 NY2d 543, 551 [1979]). [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 7:09 am
It seems like the odds of a grant are good in one or both cases. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
In Allard v. [read post]
