Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES "
Results 9781 - 9800
of 9,857
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2007, 8:23 am
United States, No. 06-5618 (cert. granted, Nov. 3, 2006); and Rita v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:35 am
It starts with this notable sentence: "The California sentencing law that the Court strikes down today is indistinguishable in any constitutionally significant respect from the advisory Guidelines scheme that the Court approved in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 5:24 am
Schaerr, representing California and 20 other states that entered the case, Smith v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 2:31 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Request for Leave to Appeal as Pauper Denied; Appeal Deemed Not Being Taken in Good Faith United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 10:55 am
Remember insurance is a voluntary business and if David Rosmiller is correct that State Farm was surprised its recent Katrina verdict (Broussard v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 7:53 am
However, I find it hard to square with his vote in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 9:03 pm
" The foundation for regime theory is the simple observation that the Constitution of the United States was adopted in several pieces--the Constitution of 1789 was supplemented by a variety of amendments. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 8:23 am
Arguing for the United States as amicus on behalf of petitioners, Solicitor General Paul D. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 1:38 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON SUCCESSFUL AND UNSUCCESSFUL NOMINATIONS OF SUPREME COURT JUSTICES BY THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
(1916-2005)
This collection is consulted by the staff of the Senate Judiciary Committee as nominees are considered! [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 1:04 pm
Wednesday's argument in Zuni Public School District No. 89 v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 6:30 pm
Washington Attorney General Robert M. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 10:40 pm
Here is the abstract:In 2002, the United States Supreme Court held that a provision of Minnesota's rules regulating the conduct of judicial elections violated the free speech guarantees contained in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 6:24 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 8:38 am
Call it Greenhouse v. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 9:11 am
I conclude with a short summary of the most salient points and with suggestions to direct legal theory away from its current state of lethargy towards a new beginning (V). [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 3:58 am
Lindor's attorneys have brought to Magistrate Judge Levy's attention a recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, USA v. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 11:15 pm
Sunday saw the late night release of Justice Roberts report on the state of the Courts. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 1:30 pm
The decline stemmed from shifts in priorities of the United States Department of Justice, which directed more of its resources toward combating terrorism. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:15 pm
True law nerds know that we all get to kick off every new year with the annual end-of-year report from the Chief Justice of the United States. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 8:59 am
United States, with its insistence on clear lines of federal and state accountability, spoke in a similar spirit. [read post]
