Search for: "State v. B. V."
Results 9781 - 9800
of 41,779
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2019, 4:00 am
" City Court answered Plaintiff's petition and alleged that Plaintiff had failed to state a claim. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:00 am
" City Court answered Plaintiff's petition and alleged that Plaintiff had failed to state a claim. [read post]
21 May 2019, 12:34 pm
”6 B. [read post]
21 May 2019, 8:27 am
These developments impact many SaaS providers, especially due to the expanded nexus provisions that many states are enacting after the United States Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
Thereafter, the court began to suffer from “citizenship exhaustion” and the “test was shelved under the section reserved for judgments of last resort to be used in exceptional circumstances only” because of the restrictive approach taken in Dereci (C-256/11, EU:C:2011:734) and O and B (C456/12, EU:C:2014:135). [read post]
21 May 2019, 4:00 am
"** Claims of exception to the mootness doctrine typically require the court to consider three issues: [a] is the question presented of a substantial public nature; [b] is there is a need for an authoritative determination for the future guidance of public officers; and [3] is there a likelihood of future recurrence of the question [see Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707].The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_03858.htm [read post]
21 May 2019, 4:00 am
"** Claims of exception to the mootness doctrine typically require the court to consider three issues: [a] is the question presented of a substantial public nature; [b] is there is a need for an authoritative determination for the future guidance of public officers; and [3] is there a likelihood of future recurrence of the question [see Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707].The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_03858.htm [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:46 am
Ct. 2419, 2427 (2015). [3] Oil States Energy Servs., L.L.C. v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 6:53 pm
V. [read post]
20 May 2019, 3:37 pm
Section 153 (1) of the Wills, Estates and Succession Act says:153 (1)Subject to subsections (2) and (3), if(a)a minor is a beneficiary or an intestate successor, and(b)there is no trustee or no trust created for the minor's interest in the estate,the personal representative, on distribution of the estate, must pay or transfer the minor's interest in the estate to the Public Guardian and Trustee in trust for the minor.In a recent decision, British Columbia (Public Guardian… [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 8:52 am
” See Whyte v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 5:49 am
How time flies! [read post]
20 May 2019, 4:00 am
Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 ... is still viable after Gross v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 4:00 am
Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 ... is still viable after Gross v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 3:22 am
" See Miranda v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Rohrmoos Venture v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:04 am
”); United States v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 3:10 am
On 30 April 2019, in Kablis v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 3:52 pm
" In today's U.S. v. [read post]
