Search for: "State v. Long"
Results 9781 - 9800
of 45,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2007, 4:43 pm
It also authorized them to enter the long-distance market. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 11:56 am
BROWN, Appellant v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:30 pm
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer in his recent powerful dissent in Glossip v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 4:25 pm
According to the 2002 case Morris v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 7:28 am
Tuesday, in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
In R (on the application of Naik) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2011] EWCA Civ 1546) the Court of Appeal confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:35 pm
Massachusetts v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 5:44 am
” Dillon v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 5:21 am
A recent decision from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Reed Elsevier Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:01 pm
Alabama and Alabama Democratic Conference v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 11:54 am
In Matter of Kaur v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 9:55 pm
SBP v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 9:55 pm
SBP v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:40 pm
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:10 am
While the elements and standards for this type of claim differ from state to state, these cases have traditionally proven to be tough ones to win. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 10:51 am
(United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:14 pm
Intellectual disability In Moore, the court did what Texas advocates and developmental-disability advocates had long asked: It struck Texas’ Briseno factors – used to exclude intellectually-disabled prisoners from the Eighth Amendment protection against execution, and named for State v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 3:45 am
In Saul Zaentz Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
Some years ago – never mind how long precisely – having little or no money in my purse, and nothing particular to interest me on TV, I thought I would commence reading some patent judgments and see a bit of the workings of the law.Chief among my motives was the overwhelming idea of the great whale of a judgment itself. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 6:02 am
McGraw v. [read post]
