Search for: "State v. Long."
Results 9781 - 9800
of 51,507
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2020, 8:00 am
When the Supreme Court entertains argument on Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 4:57 pm
(See Moore v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 1:50 pm
“[A plaintiff] cannot state a claim for trade secret protection under UTSA by simply ‘producing long lists of general areas of information which contain unidentified trade secrets. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 9:57 am
But the plaintiff’s home state is irrelevant under Walden v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
So long as the South remained a one-party region and the black vote was effectively suppressed, the principled incentive to use either district-based or proportional schemes in other states was diminished. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 5:58 am
I live-tweeted about the Google v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
Auth. v New York State Pub. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
Auth. v New York State Pub. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:52 pm
See Febre v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 8:21 pm
Tanzin v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 pm
” However, in this case, Alito stressed, Chuang “saw the pandemic as a ground for expanding the abortion right recognized in Roe v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 2:24 pm
" And in general, the courts declined to intervene so long as the state also restricted "comparable" activities. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm
Senate adopted a unanimous resolution in March 2015 which states, among other things, that the IoT “has the potential to generate trillions of dollars in economic opportunity” and that the United States should “develop a strategy to incentivize development of the IoT for connected technologies to empower consumers, foster future economic growth, and improve collective social well-being…” If these and similar efforts gain traction in today’s… [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am
(1) Trial court’s instructions that the jury “will determine what the assault was” did not amount to an improper expression of opinion on the evidence in context; (2) The trial court’s response to a jury question during deliberations regarding a prior conviction was an not impermissible expression of opinion on the evidence State v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 7:48 am
Oracle America (petitioner v. respondent as opposed to plaintiff v. defendant): the Android maker's non-copyrightability defense has a snow flake's chance in hell.I wrote yesterday's triumphant post on the basis of having listened to the hearing on C-SPAN Radio (over the web). [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
(579) Yet, as Fulton v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 3:03 am
Not too long ago, I blogged about the quest for director diversity information and included one sample D&O question for consideration – and, this Dorsey blog includes another sample question. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Writing in dissent in Comptroller v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 7:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm
(relisted after the Sept. 29 conference) United States v. [read post]