Search for: "State v. Michael A." Results 9781 - 9800 of 13,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2019, 1:37 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Benjamin Wittes
In 1920, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:09 am by Elina Saxena
Ben alerted us to the European Court of Human Rights’ opinion in Roman Zakharov v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:09 pm by Jordan Brunner
Elena Chachko discussed EU sanctions and international humanitarian law in her examination of the Court of Justice of the European Union case, A v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
In LVMH Watch & Jewellery Australia Pty Limited v Michael Lassanah & Ors [2011] NSWCA 370 the Court of Appeal in New South Wales allowed an appeal on the issue of qualified privilege and set aside the judgment in favour of the plaintiffs. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
The Michael Geist blog had an article on the government’s response to the near-universal criticism of its Online Harms consultation. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
(PatLit)   United States US General House approves USPTO funding bill (Managing Intellectual Property) US measures to strengthen trade enforcement (Intellectual Property Watch)   US Patents Peer-to-patent project set on hold. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:15 am by INFORRM
Facebook is unhappy about the CJEU’s recent decision in Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook Ireland Ltd (C 18/18), which held that the social media company could be ordered by member states to remove equivalent content, worldwide when content is deemed illegal in a member state. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: USPTO upholds one of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF’s) human stem cell patents (decisions are pending on two other patents): (IPKat), (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), English High Court rules Qualcomm’s patents invalid in battle against Nokia: (Philip Brooks), (IPEG), (IP… [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:20 am
UPDATE:  The California Supreme Court's decision in Rico v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am by INFORRM
This week will see the State Opening of Parliament. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am by Walter Shaub
Meadows to the State of Georgia’s Response to his Notice of Removal at 1, State of Georgia v. [read post]