Search for: "Thomas Long" Results 9781 - 9800 of 11,572
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
How Justice Thomas’s ‘Nearly Adopted Daughter’ Became His Law Clerk Yahoo News – Steve Eder and Abbie VanSickle (New York Times) | Published: 3/28/2024 One of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’s law clerks for the court’s next term will be Crystal Clanton, a conservative organizer turned lawyer, who has such a close relationship with Thomas and his wife that the couple informally refer to her as their “nearly adopted… [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:01 pm by Mark Bennett
I republish it here in its entirety because, while it is lengthy (King acknowledges that: "what else can one do when he is alone in a narrow jail cell, other than write long letters, think long thoughts and pray long prayers? [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 5:00 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  The new party line -- strictly enforced -- is that Republicans must say that domestic terrorists are not terrorists (so long as they support Donald Trump), and any effort to investigate the insurrection is itself an attack on America.Frequent readers of Dorf on Law are by now accustomed to reading about my deep pessimism about the future of the rule of law and constitutional democracy in this country. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 11:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The history and tradition view of the 1A would—as Thomas very much wants—rewrite the rest of 1A doctrine. [read post]
8 May 2017, 7:43 am by Jon
It did not specify how long they needed to reside there, and that was arguably a serious oversight, but the words have so far not been abused as much as they could have been.The third sentence begins:No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States;This is the Privileges or immunities clause, which was ignored by the Supreme Court in reaching its decision in the Slaughterhouse Cases, and which has been ignored ever… [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 11:52 am
Thomas Church in New York, where she poignantly reminded us, quote, “Grief is the price we pay for love. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 7:30 am
Justice Antonin Scalia was the most outspoken proponent of this view, but Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch also generally adhere to it. [read post]
21 May 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
For the Symposium on Timothy William Waters's Boxing Pandora: Rethinking Borders, States, and Secession in a Democratic World (Yale University Press, 2020) and F. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  The reason is relatively simple:  As a “defense intellectual,” immersed at the time in the work of Thomas Schelling and other rationalistic game theorists, I “knew” that the event was something of a charade conducted between leaders of the two great powers, both of whom realized that it was literally insane to engage in a nuclear exchange (or, perhaps, any other armed conflict); this meant that we were observing a kind of Kabuki theater. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 10:51 am by Chuck Cosson
  And, as such, the Court should be cautious in setting long-term rules to govern a rapidly evolving medium. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Thus, given the goal of calculating a nationwide majority winner, one is stymied by Florida as long as it does not change its own system for conducting a popular vote. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 1:03 pm by Daniel Shaviro
(Or, for that matter, of the withholding taxes.)In the long run, one can't make foreign shareholder bear US tax liability under classic "small open economy assumptions. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 2:19 pm
First, we engage with geography’s long-standing critique of the binary conception of territory and network in the context of globalization—a debate that has gained renewed urgency and complexity with the advent of digitalisation and information technology. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 10:40 am by Guest Blogger
They insisted that the power to decide on the territorial boundaries of a foreign nation is part of the power to recognize which government represents that nation – a power that American Presidents have long claimed belongs exclusively and inherently to the President. [read post]