Search for: "US v. Weekes" Results 9781 - 9800 of 39,098
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2009, 3:01 am
The argument last week played out against the background of the 1999 decision in State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 9:56 am by A
It ruled in favor of AT&T in a decision that basically bans class actions and requires arbitration of individual consumer complaints in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 6:51 am
Last week we encountered arguments from the other side that any justice (at least any justice that might be defense oriented) owning any stock in any pharmaceutical company ought to recuse him/herself from Wyeth v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 7:45 pm
I returned to the office today, haven't had time to read the SCOTUS opinions in Cuomo v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Oliveira while also previewing this week’s argument in Nielsen v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 9:17 am by Jerri Lynn Ward, J.D.
Every week, DADS issues important news alerts for providers. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 3:00 am by Karen Tani
” The "doll studies" factored importantly into the Brown v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 1:17 pm by Steve Kalar
A slow week in the Ninth (for non-capital cases, at least), and an order amending the opinion, gives us an excuse to go back for a second pass at the interesting decision and sentencing issues in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 4:09 am
This week brings bad news (via the Chronicle of Higher Education, and picked up by Slashdot - although most of the /. comments centre on a silly argument of academic jobs vs ‘the real world’) of a dispute with uncomfortable similarities to Felten v RIAA (where the recording industry tried to squash the publication of copy-protection-testing research results, despite the fact that the researchers started their work in response to a music industry ‘public… [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
In SEC v Capital Gains Research Bureau the US Supreme Court said a pump and dump scheme by an investment adviser violated its fiduciary duty. [read post]