Search for: "United States v. Good"
Results 9781 - 9800
of 21,069
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2015, 7:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm
"); 554 US at 625 ("We therefore read [United States v] Miller [, 307 US 174 (1939),] to say only that the Second Amendment does not protect those weapon not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes, such as short-barreled shotguns. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 2:03 pm
So, understandably, some people believe that states could limit the agenda of an Article V convention. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 1:59 pm
“We are acutely aware the statute in question attempts to address the terrible toll impaired drivers inflict on our state’s highways, but we are reminded of the ‘truism that constitutional protections have costs,’” said the Declerck court citing the United State Supreme Court ‘s decision in Coy v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 10:52 am
In Pollock v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
If you think all necessary evidence was admitted before the TTAB, you have the option of appealing the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 3:00 am
§ 552 (FOIA), is a federal law that allow for the full or partial disclosure of previously unreleased information and documents controlled by the United States government. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 4:00 pm
" United States v Yancey, 621 F3d 681, 684-85 (7th Cir. 2010). [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 3:42 pm
" United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
(Heller v District of Columbia ["Heller II"], 698 F Supp 2d 179 [D DC 2010]; Ezell v City of Chicago, — F Supp 2d —, 2010 WL 3998104 [ND Ill 2010]).4 Page 4 Penal Law §§ 265.01 and 400.005 Penal Law § 265.01(1) states, in relevant part, that a "person is guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree when: (1) [h]e possesses any firearm. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:36 pm
" United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:59 am
<> The Hopi Tribe v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:48 am
Citing its recent opinions in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:44 am
” The final point ended up consuming a good bit of Hallward-Driemeier’s time: what to make of the decision of the major institutional actors that appeared in the case – the United States and the Bank of America – to file on the debtor’s side, supporting the right to appeal. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 6:46 am
As Wikipedia explains, bankruptcy in the United Statesis a matter placed under federal jurisdiction by the United States Constitution (in Article 1,Section 8, Clause 4), which allows Congress to enact `uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States’. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 12:23 pm
I mean, the United States would treat both the same, right? [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 12:13 pm
Williams noted that the United States Supreme Court in Missouri v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 11:42 am
United States on SSRN. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:51 am
Yesterday’s decision in Armstrong v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
(Gilligan's current show, Better Call Saul, is also quite good. [read post]
