Search for: "Ex Parte May"
Results 9801 - 9820
of 12,870
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2022, 2:35 pm
It is “improper for the trial court to consider the evidence heard at the ex parte hearing” People ex rel. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
(IP finance) US General - Decisions PepsiCo's $1.2 billion court no-show in trade secrets misappropriation case brought in connection with AquaFina bottled water (IPKat) Adequately indentifying trade secrets in California trade secret misappropriation litigation: Brescia v Angelin (JIPLP) US Patent Reform Patent 'reform' may happen this year, after all (Patent Docs) US Patents Study conducted by Stuart J H Graham and Dietmar Harhoff concludes US would benefit from EPO-style… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
(IP finance) US General - Decisions PepsiCo's $1.2 billion court no-show in trade secrets misappropriation case brought in connection with AquaFina bottled water (IPKat) Adequately indentifying trade secrets in California trade secret misappropriation litigation: Brescia v Angelin (JIPLP) US Patent Reform Patent 'reform' may happen this year, after all (Patent Docs) US Patents Study conducted by Stuart J H Graham and Dietmar Harhoff concludes US would benefit from EPO-style… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Group, Inc v Jungle Networks, Inc (Gray on Claims) BPAI holds term indefinite and summarizes reasoning behind broadest reasonable interpretation rule: Ex parte Senju Metal Industry Co (Gray on Claims) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Amkor Technology – ITC issues supplemental initial determination finding non-invalidity under 35 USC §§ 102(g) and 103(a) of certain asserted patent claims in investigation concerning… [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:26 pm
Online ads are a small part of the global ad industry’s revenue. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:27 pm
” This broadly mirrored the case law, notably, R v Brent LBC, ex p. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 4:52 pm
Much of this information may be generated by organisations in the private sector and requested by agencies directly from them. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 5:07 pm
HLM, an unpublished decision issued on May 13, 2014, where the defendant had been found guilty of writing “disturbing” posts on Facebook regarding her ex-husband and children in violation of a special condition of probation (SCP), and rejecting the defendant’s First Amendment claims in that regard. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 5:37 am
(This post is part of a five-part series on regulating online content moderation.) [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 12:14 pm
Roe also reported as part of her Title IX complaint that she had suffered a rib fracture from her encounter with Doe on February 13. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:27 pm
” This broadly mirrored the case law, notably, R v Brent LBC, ex p. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 12:10 pm
It may be true that Mr. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 4:24 am
Ex parte Arthur, 711 So. 2d 1097 (Ala. 1997) Arthur's application for re-hearing was denied 1998. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 2:50 am
Best Price Stacking We previously blogged about the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in United States Ex Rel. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
Prejudice is not a necessary condition for delay to be inordinate, although it may contribute to such a finding. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 2:16 pm
In any proceedings under this section, the Court shall, upon request of the Government, review ex parte and in camera any Government submission, or portions of a submission, which may include classified information. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 7:34 am
The Court noted that some of Segovia's allegations were previously considered in Arkansas State Court, in an ex parte proceeding which ultimately granted custody to Segovia. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
Colo. 2020) (denying motion to proceed using pseudonym where request was based on potential embarrassment due to plaintiff's diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder); Doe ex rel. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 1:41 pm
See Ex. 2, Depo. of G. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 9:43 am
In support of this recommendation, the testimony noted that patent prosecution is ex parte even though third parties in the same field may have relevant information and expertise to the evaluation of a patent application and that patent litigation in federal court is extremely costly and lengthy and is not an option unless the patent owner has threatened the potential challenger with patent infringement litigation. [read post]
