Search for: "In INTEREST OF FEW v. State" Results 9801 - 9820 of 11,607
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2012, 5:45 am by AstuteLegalVideos.com
[xi] Klein was detained under the order that the Colombian Government had issued to INTERPOL a few months before. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:12 am by Florian Mueller
The most important smartphone IP ruling in the months ahead is going to be the opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the Oracle v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Heller said there had to be balancing of rights and state interests, but the opinion left open how that balance was to be struck. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:47 am by Eric Goldman
The 2011 district court opinion dealt with numerous interesting issues. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 6:50 am by Thomas Surmanski
 A similar issue was explored by the Supreme Court in R. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
The two-day conferencegathered the intellectual acumen of many academic and professional leaders from Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Macau, mainland China, Netherlands, Singapore, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and  United States, to name but a few. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
We believe there is merit in more broadly exploring what the United States can learn from comparative administrative law in general. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 7:51 pm by Josh Blackman
Alito, who had authored the 2022 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am by David Pozen
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Above all that, it was clearly wrongly decided, and illustrates how some judges have bad interpretive instincts when it comes to navigating the tricky but ultra-important voting rights realm.The case, Texas Democratic Party v. [read post]
14 Mar 2025, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Probably not, but the few of you who said yes will really like this Sixth Circuit opinion. [read post]