Search for: "JAMES V. STATE"
Results 9801 - 9820
of 10,692
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2008, 3:25 pm
Otero of the United States District Court for the Central District of California has ruled in UMG Recordings v. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 4:51 am
“Poland is the 51st state,” one former C.I.A. official recalls James L. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 4:48 pm
States that have killed inmates since the Supreme Court ruling in Baze v. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 10:01 am
The Baze DecisionOn April 16, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued its plurality opinion inBaze v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 1:19 pm
” Wichita County v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:47 am
OR STATE GOVERNMENT WORKS [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (Spicy IP), Latin America: Merck Serono signs distribution agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb for portfolio of established pharmaceutical brands in Latin America: (IP tango), US: Biotech industry growth to slow due to funding pressures and competition from biosimilars: (Managing Intellectual Property), US: House Commerce Committee posts responses to its questions on biogenerics; not surprisingly, the views run the gamut: (FDA Law Blog), US: Biosimilar debate heats up at BIO: (Managing… [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 2:04 am
Even so, the combined effects of KSR v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 12:44 am
United States, No. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 2:31 pm
Blake, 888 F.2d at 798; United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 1:15 pm
In 2001, the Supreme Court, in Zadvydas v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 11:10 pm
For a more complete discussion of the issue, see James S. ex rel. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 8:34 am
Louis V. de la Vergne. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 4:35 pm
Supreme Court didn't face such a standard in its April ruling (Baze v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 2:38 am
Kansas v. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 5:29 pm
The Sunday Indy Star column, Behind Closed Doors, has this item today on tomorrows oral arguments in the case of State of Indiana v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 4:43 pm
Co. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:12 pm
See James v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 4:29 am
The high court is scheduled to consider whether to take up the case, Dupuy v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
