Search for: "Matter of Thomas" Results 9801 - 9820 of 11,400
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2007, 9:47 pm
Strickland said he has no intention of placing a moratorium on capital punishment in Ohio.He also said, according to the AP, "that he is open to new information on the matter, but for now is satisfied that Ohio has a fair and impartial system. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm by cdw
The Court noted that the Supreme Court has held that entitlement to peremptory challenges is a matter of State law, and that there is no constitutional right to peremptory challenges. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 7:49 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Thomas O’Leary explains this in the Alberta Law Review Society, Most policies have a number of mechanisms… to safeguard the principle of risk and preclude cover for intentionally caused losses. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
They still make noises about supply-side fantasies, but it sometimes seems more like a matter of muscle memory than actual conviction on their part. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Justice Alito, writing for himself, Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Scalia, Kennedy and Thomas, observed that, to have standing to sue in federal court under Article III of the Constitution, a plaintiff must suffer suffer a concrete and particularized injury that is “actual or imminent” and “fairly traceable” to the challenged action. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
The Hugh Stephens Blog has a riposte entitled “The Effectiveness of Site Blocking: It is matter of common sense”. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 8:39 am by Amy Howe
  Three of the Justices who dissented in Grutter – Justices Kennedy, Scalia, and Thomas – remain firmly opposed to affirmative action, as does Chief Justice John Roberts, who succeeded the fourth dissenter, the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 12:00 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
In these circumstances, the contractor must undertake to have the “matter” adjudicated; or Because it disputes the subcontractor’s claim in which case the notice of non-payment to the subcontractor must specify the amount not being paid and detail “all of the reasons for non-payment”, and must be given with the said 35 day period. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm by Steve Lubet
The letter for publication reflected the matters addressed in the open letter that prompted Dr. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 5:51 am
  He approached this stranger and asked her what was the matter (or at least, so the story goes). [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:22 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Airgas responded by retaining Cozen O'Connor chairman Stephen Cozen, litigation chair Jeffrey Weil and litigation partner Thomas Wilkinson Jr., for a civil suit against Cravath in state court in Pennsylvania. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 6:00 am by Peter K. Rofes
Noteworthy, too, was the appearance of Alabama’s code of ethics, spurred by the pathbreaking work of Thomas Goode Jones. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 10:36 am by Eric Goldman
StubHub case, and Justice Thomas’ unhinged blog post in the Malwarebytes case. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am by Guest Author
 As Thomas Merrill has noted, “[a]dministrative rulemaking, at least in its modern guise, is subject to a much more unyielding set of procedural requirements” than legislative statute-making. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
Plaintiffs-appellants Paul Brown, William Fanaly, Charles Thomas, Gary Riggs, Robert Orlikowski, and Scott Way (plaintiffs) filed suit in federal district court against defendants-appellees Cassens Transport Company (Cassens), Crawford & Company (Crawford), and Dr. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 3:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
Justice May, joined by Justice McDermott, added a separate concurrence putting the matter this way: In this case, COVID safety and overall trial fairness were certainly "overriding interest[s]" that the district court had to address. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 8:50 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court of British Columbia wrestled with this very issue in a recent decision in Thomas and Saik’uz First Nation v Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. [read post]