Search for: "People v. Grant" Results 9801 - 9820 of 16,997
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2014, 4:56 am by Giles Peaker
 They have scored a early hat trick in being granted permission, an expedited hearing, and a protective costs order. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 4:56 am by Giles Peaker
 They have scored a early hat trick in being granted permission, an expedited hearing, and a protective costs order. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 3:45 pm by National Indian Law Library
Black (tribal disenrollment)* State Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2014state.htmlCases featured: People v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 6:39 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Eight years after the Supreme Court limited the rights of public employees to speak out in the workplace, the Court is returning to that issue, granting certiorari on the issue of when management may discipline workers for testifying truthfully in court.The case is Lane v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 7:05 am
AuclairCharter of Rights and Freedoms: In 2009, police in Quebec arrested more than 150 people associated with the Hells Angels. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 10:56 am by Parker Higgins
A Supreme Victory The fair use doctrine is deeply rooted in US law, but one of its watershed moments for innovation occurred thirty years ago today, in the case of Sony v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:28 am by Ronald Mann
  Many years ago (in the 1960s) one or more people, including one Frank Petrella, wrote a screenplay about the boxer Jake LaMotta. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 4:05 am
Last year, adds the office, which would never dream of praising itself, "after a high-quality search and examination process, the EPO granted and published 66,700 patents, which was 1.7% more than in 2012. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 12:38 pm
”The Supreme Court today also granted leave to appeal in the right-to-die case, Carter v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:50 am by Amy Howe
” The editorial board of The Washington Times encourages the Court to grant cert. in Whirlpool Corp. v. [read post]