Search for: "State v House" Results 9801 - 9820 of 27,849
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2017, 11:47 am by Garrett Hinck
Sauter posted the government's reply brief in Carpenter v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 9:36 am by Eduardo Ustaran and Sam Choi
The bill is currently at the beginning of the parliamentary process, with the first reading in the House of Lords held on September 13, to be followed by a second reading scheduled for October 10. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 9:25 am by Vanessa Sauter
The White House’s newest proclamation  amending the administration’s travel ban now includes North Korea. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 7:30 am by Amy Howe
But in 2010, Republicans won control of both houses of the state legislature and the governor’s office, which led to the legislature, instead of the courts, redrawing the maps after the 2010 census. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am by Dan Carvajal
The central revenue feature of Ohio House Bill 66 of 2005 (which was also the biennial budget), the Commercial Activity Tax was designed to phase in as corporation franchise and tangible personal property taxes phased out. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:49 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Case law and a cuppa Sad as I am I actually read them over a cup of tea, such as the bizarre case of Regina v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 7:17 pm by Patricia Salkin
Thorpe v Upper Makefield Township, 2017 WL 42609049 (ED PA 9/25/2017)Filed under: Due Process, Equal Protection, Uncategorized [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
In late 2013, WPR, on behalf of its client NCO, filed suits in Illinois state court seeking repayment of student debt owed by Marquez, Garriga, and Russell. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 6:15 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Rolling Stone later retracted the story, stating that the female student was untrustworthy in light of discrepancies in her account. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:17 am by Andrew King
United States, holding that the use of a “Stingray” cellsite simulator required a warrant under the Fourth Amendment, Chris Seaton and Andrew King were challenged to debate whether the Third-Party Doctrine or the Supreme Court’s Riley v. [read post]