Search for: "State v. Country" Results 9801 - 9820 of 26,701
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Peter Margulies
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Peter Margulies
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Peter Margulies
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
” Congress included the “no other action” requirement “to prevent plaintiffs from using the local controversy exception to avoid federal jurisdiction, remand cases to state courts, and bring ‘copycat’ class actions in various states across the country. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 10:00 am by Josh Blackman
The letter states: As Attorney General of the United States, I have a duty to defend the Constitution and to faithfully execute the laws passed by Congress. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 6:21 am by Michael Geist
Its application states that at least 20 countries have site blocking, some with courts (the UK) and some without (Portugal). [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:30 am by Masahiro Kurosaki
Sari and Nasu’s argument is predicated on the fact that Article V of the treaty does not expressly require a request or advance consultation for the exercise of collective self-defense, and that a related 1960 exchange of notes (also available in English) expressly exempts operations conducted under Article V from requirements for “prior consultation” that otherwise apply to major changes in the presence of U.S. troops, equipment, or facilities in Japanese… [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:25 am by Aimee Denholm
The substantive issues in this case concerned the position under the Directive 2004/38/EC of a child who is a third country national but has been placed in the legal guardianship of EU citizens under the Islamic “kefalah” system in her own country. [read post]
We frequently represent individuals in Social Security disability claims who are suffering from the effects of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), in circumstances that many times involve military Veterans who have served our country. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
He stated in an interview with the CBC, “fundamentally, it’s about business models that will solve these issues”. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
In the Barnett/Blackman constitutional law casebook, we included this introduction to United States v. [read post]