Search for: "State v. Downs"
Results 9801 - 9820
of 40,855
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2009, 4:55 pm
Section 4581(e) in the case of Gaudio v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 7:39 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overruled Roe v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 3:29 pm
So the case came down to whether or not the exemption was rationally related to a legitimate state interest. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:08 pm
On 22 May 2015 Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of QRS v Beach. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:44 am
Now, the first of these decisions is available: the German Federal Supreme Court [Bundesgerichtshof] has handed down the written reasons for its decision in Sisvel v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 5:45 am
In the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 7:15 am
In South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:06 pm
But as the transcripts show, there is still plenty of drama: If the court’s four liberals are already resigned to their sure-to-be scathing dissent, they aren’t going down without a fight. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:14 am
Thus, in R (Elias) v Secretary of State for Defence [2006] 1 WLR 3213 para 165 provides that in discrimination cases there should be a structured approach to the question of justification: “First, is the objective sufficiently important to justify limiting a fundamental right? [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 11:59 pm
O'Brien and SONY BMG v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Co. of Philadelphia v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 7:01 am
Department of Labor (DOL) has proposed to amend the Regulations implementing the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) by revising the definition of “spouse” in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Department of Labor (DOL) has proposed to amend the Regulations implementing the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) by revising the definition of “spouse” in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 8:12 am
In Bucklew v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 8:04 am
Case citation: Hardin v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 8:15 am
Indeed, in striking down the aggregate contribution limits in McCutcheon v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:25 am
Court rules that the appointing authority made its appointments consistent with the requirements of Section 61.1 of the Civil Service Law Cherry v New York State Civ. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 9:34 am
McCormick v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 2:03 pm
Berghuis v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:22 am
’” United States v. [read post]