Search for: "State v. Field" Results 9801 - 9820 of 12,947
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2011, 6:34 am by John Elwood
United States, 10-7515, for United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
We recommend section 1 be amended both to state the survival of common law innocent dissemination – as recently clarified in Metropolitan Schools v DesignTechnica [2009] EWHC 1765 (QB) – and to bring the scope of section 1 into line with the Ecommerce Directive -or better still, to delete the current section and cross-refer to the protection of the Directive. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:42 pm by Joey Fishkin
Valeo in 1976.In Arizona Free Enterprise v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
” If the amount of subsidy available is too large, it may be too expensive for a state to pay for, given the many demands on state treasuries, she said. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 3:57 pm by Steve Bainbridge
"(93) The defendants appealed the case to the United States Supreme Court as part of the four case litigation encompassed in Brown v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:35 am by Edward Craven, Matrix.
The Preamble to the Directive explains that it was intended “to promote the approximation of laws in this field” i.e. it was not intended to create absolute harmonisation of the laws of the Member States on business transfers. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:12 pm by Richard D. Friedman
For the first time in a substantive Confrontation Clause opinion in the Crawford era (I’m not counting Whorton v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm by George M. Wallace
Doudna states in his supporting affidavit that he did not write, post, or even read that report at the time. [read post]