Search for: "State v. Roberts"
Results 9801 - 9820
of 16,791
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2016, 6:00 am
Attorney Robert Goldman and former FBI Special Agent Robert Wittman serve as an illustration. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:54 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court on Monday heard oral argument in Patel v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:40 pm
Menell & Robert P. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:55 am
Tex. 1990), aff'd sub. nom., U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 11:03 am
Dreeben argues in Turner v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:14 am
In fact, said the Court (in a majority opinion by Chief Justice Roberts), the states and the federal government work together to make law in this area. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 2:24 pm
Grimmett v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 3:53 pm
What better way to virtue signal and promote bipartisanship then to vote to uphold Roe v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 9:52 am
For publication opinions today (3): In Robert Thompson, et al. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:31 pm
Roberts, 448 U.S. 56, 66 (1980), overturned 541 U.S. 36. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:09 am
In 2008, the majority in a 5-4 decision said in District of Columbia v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 4:29 am
” Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes looks at the case of a part-time municipal judge in Mississippi who has “asked the Supreme Court to intervene in what so far has been an unsuccessful federal lawsuit claiming the [Mississippi state] flag promotes white supremacy and violates the equal-protection rights of black Mississippians. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 5:04 am
In other words, they hold a position closer to where the concurrence of Chief Justice John Roberts would have left the matter: to uphold Mississippi’s law while preserving Roe v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:41 pm
As I pointed out in a prior post the 1983 Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 8:53 am
" The Yakama v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 5:32 pm
Texas and Roper v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:07 pm
Specifically, the Court stated the displacement test as simply “whether the statute speaks directly to the question at issue,” and that in this case, Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
Adolphe, Robert L. [read post]
