Search for: "State v. Self"
Results 9801 - 9820
of 14,112
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2012, 5:21 am
This decision, Damache v DPP [2012] IESC 11 (discussed here), found that s.29(1) of the Offences Against the State Act 1939, which had been in operation for the past 36 years having been inserted by s.5 of the Criminal Law Act 1976, was contrary to the Constitution. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 7:13 am
Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name: Lemus v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
App. 1975) (a "state can never sue in tort in its political or governmental capacity"), aff'd, 356 N.E.2d 561 (Ill. 1976).Chicago v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 11:18 am
Read: “New Texas laws: Brass knuckles, other self-defense items legal in Texas starting Sept. 1,” published August 28, 2019, by KDFW. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
" A spot of sparring in the States. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am
As stated by the judges’ decisions in Unwired Planet v Huawei and TCL v Ericsson, respectively: “Based on my assessment of both experts, I am sure the disagreement represents cases in which reasonable people can differ. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 4:52 am
As I’ve explained in earlier posts, the rules of evidence applicable in every state and in the federal judicial system bar the use of hearsay. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm
The board will arbitrate difficult decisions about content moderation, based both on appeals from users, and self-referrals from Facebook itself. [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 9:37 pm
Serbia and Montenegro) Case Resources Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:49 pm
In Pfeiffer v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm
Establish a self-regulatory organization (SRO) to establish and enforce standards of conduct. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 3:50 am
In two recent decisions (“Unwired Planet” and “Conversant”) (Unwired Planet v Huawei [2018] EWCA Civ 2344, IPKat post here; Huawei v Conversant [2019] EWCA Civ 38, IPKat post here), the English Court of Appeal has endorsed this practice.Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory? [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 2:41 pm
In 1985, in O’Brien v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 7:14 am
V. [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:09 am
Florida and United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 1:18 am
On appeal, in Barnhard v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 8:51 am
R.I. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:37 am
ACLU, United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:36 am
Partnership v. [read post]
